How to cite a legislative debate

Bluebook (22d ed.) citation format · B13 / R13.5 · Statutes & legislation

Example

123 Cong. Rec. 17147 (1977).

More examples

Each of these is checked against the rules on every change to the tool.

What the citation needs

Required

When they apply

In a brief and in a law review

The Bluebook sets citations two ways: the Bluepages for court documents and legal memoranda, the Whitepages for law review footnotes. Here is the first example above as each one prints it, in its typeface.

Court documents (Bluepages)

123 Cong. Rec. 17147 (1977).

Law review footnotes (Whitepages)

123 Cong. Rec. 17147 (1977).

The words are the same in both; only the typeface changes.

Common mistakes

Each of these is a citation the checker refuses, with what it says is wrong and the corrected form.

Wrong

123 Congressional Record 17147 (1977).

Why

Give the author, or the editor/translator, or the publisher (R15.1; R15.2(d)).

Give the author, or the editor/translator, or the publisher (R15.1; R15.2(d)).

Right

123 Cong. Rec. 17147 (1977).

Wrong

131 Cong. Rec. S11465–66 (Sep. 13, 1985) (statement of Sen. Malcolm Wallop).

Why

The permanent edition of the Congressional Record drops the “S” page prefix; keep it only in a “daily ed.” citation (R13.5).

Right

131 Cong. Rec. S11465–66 (daily ed. Sep. 13, 1985) (statement of Sen. Malcolm Wallop).

Wrong

Cong. Globe, 36th Cong., 1st Session 1672 (1860).

Why

Abbreviate “Session” to “Sess.” (T9).

Right

Cong. Globe, 36th Cong., 1st Sess. 1672 (1860).

Governing rules

B13 / R13.5

Build this citation with the generator, check one you have already written, or paste a whole list of footnotes to check them in order.

Related source types

Statutes & legislation: